Pix courtesy: youtube.com |
HOPE KASHMIR CEASEFIRE DOES NOT BACKFIRE?
Ceasefire
may sound good politically, but all political decisions do not necessarily lead
to the desired results. Ceasefire is acceptable as long as both the warring
parties agree to it. Holding a ceasefire unilaterally against the mercenaries
is akin to waving a white flag. The Bharatiya Janata Party-led central
government’s decision to announce ceasefire in Kashmir during the Muslim holy
month of Ramadan is a well-intentioned move, taken primarily to please its partner
People’s Democratic Party (PDP) in Jammu and Kashmir with whom it shares power.
One hopes the country does not have to pay a heavy price for this unilateral
decision which has already been met with disdain by militant groups active in
Kashmir.
Pakistan-based
Lashkar-e-Toiba took no time in rejecting the ceasefire calling it a drama. And
a day after maintaining a studied silence, the Kashmir-based separatist leaders
– Syed Ali Geelani, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq and Yasin Malik too denounced the
ceasefire. It is ample clear that militants and separatists don’t understand
the language of peace and have little regard for the safety and well-being of the
common people who are also falling prey in the process, and want Kashmir to be
on the boil just only to please their masters sitting across the border. The
separatist leaders are the biggest disruptive forces who have time and again
shown their true colour by obstructing the peace process.
Now the big
question is whether the armed forces were taken on board when the decision was
taken? They are the people who have been staking their lives, making countless
sacrifices since the militancy erupted in Kashmir in the late eighties. According
to the South Asia Terrorism Portal (SATP), 6,387 Indian soldiers have laid down
their lives (till May 13, 2018) since 1988 when militancy raised its ugly head
in Kashmir. During the same period, 14,828 innocent civilians had to lose their
lives. In the last 30 years, Indian soldiers neutralised 23,423 militants.
These figures speak for the valour of the security personnel who did not flinch
in shedding their blood to bring normalcy to the troubled state. At a time,
when the armed forces had been on the hot pursuit against the militants, mostly
infiltrated into Kashmir from Pakistan, comes this shocker in the form of
ceasefire.
Already 30
Indian soldiers have been martyred in Kashmir this year since January as
against 72 militants. The figures show the militants have become more lethal,
better armed and well-trained to cause maximum casualties. Any amount of
leniency towards militants is bound to demoralise the forces which are up
against all odds. Not only do they have to bear the brunt of the locals who
offer themselves as shields to help escape militants, but often pelt security
forces with stones to prevent them from launching any offensive against the
militants. Can one understand the pain and agony of these security personnel
who face humiliation at the hands of civilians on whose protection they are endangering
their lives?
Did the
government take into account the fears of security forces that the militants
may recoup during the one-month period which may only allow them to
re-energise? The militants have been on the back foot right now and lowering
the guard against them seems to be a suicidal idea. Of late, several high
profile militants have been accounted for, leading to vaccum in the leadership
of several militant groups. Therefore, dropping the gun at a time when the
security forces were having upper hand is beyond reason. The need of the hour
was to maintain the hot trail against the militants whose morale is low.
siasat.com |
youtube.com |
Even one
presumes that the local militants may adhere to ceasefire, there is every
reason to believe that Pakistan-based militants will not? One such group has
already made its intention clear. Summers are the perfect months when militants
make infiltrations into Kashmir from the Pakistani side. Already there have
been 48 infiltration bids from across the border till April this year, of which
24 attempts have been successful. Pakistan just can’t resist the temptation to
push in as many militants taking advantage of the weather. Moreover, it will do
all it can to force Indian security personnel to retaliate so as to put them
into poor light. As long as Pakistan does not become party to the ceasefire and
follows it in letter and spirit, these one-sided ceasefire offers will hold no
water.
The fight
against militancy can’t be successful with such knee-jerk reactions when the
adversary uses it as a proxy war against you. In order to win the war against
terrorism, one will have to keep in mind that militancy cannot be contained; it
has to be stamped out completely. We have a perfect example in Punjab. Smarting
under humiliating defeats, Pakistan first took advantage of the simmering
situation in Punjab and played host to several Khalistani militants. Not only
did it shelter them at its backyard, Pakistan financed and trained them
militarily as well. It took a heavy-handed approach of the then governments
which helped in wiping out militancy from the state.
Why can’t
the same approach be applied to Kashmir? When its purpose was defeated in Punjab,
Pakistan turned to Kashmir. Needless to say, there is an undeclared war in
Kashmir. Thousands of people have been killed in Jammu and Kashmir in the last
three decades in the name of the so-called freedom movement. The government of
India just can’t and should not afford to be lenient to the mercenaries who are
out to disturb the social fabric of the country. We just can’t let down our
security forces.
No comments:
Post a Comment